Oral Plenary Session I and Late-Breaking
Oral Plenary Sessions
Jackie Patterson, BA, BS, MD, MPH
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Waldemar A. Carlo, MD (he/him/his)
Professor
Center for Women’s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Vestavia Hills, Alabama, United States
In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we compared the costs and effects of azithromycin versus standard care using a probabilistic decision tree model informed by published results and primary data from the Azithromycin Prevention in Labor Use (A-PLUS) trial. From a healthcare sector perspective, we considered the costs of azithromycin treatment and its effect on maternal outcomes and healthcare use related to infection. We used country-specific costs and considered Zambia the median country based on the cost per day for hospital stays. Our model results represent the average of 100,000 model runs, each using a randomly selected set of parameters drawn from model distributions.
Results: Azithromycin resulted in 769 maternal sepsis or death cases averted, 809 maternal infections averted and 495 maternal hospitalizations averted per 100,000 pregnancies (Table). The cost of the intervention was $90,963 per 100,000 pregnancies, or $0.91 per pregnancy. The reduction in healthcare use resulted in cost-savings for all countries except Bangladesh (which had the lowest cost for healthcare use). The median country cost-savings was $18,451 per 100,000 pregnancies.
Conclusion: Azithromycin in women planning a vaginal birth is a cost-saving, effective treatment to reduce maternal sepsis or death and maternal infection. This cost-savings strengthens the evidence in support of implementing azithromycin in intrapartum care in LMICs.