Ultrasound/Imaging
Poster Session 1
Mirella Mourad, MD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, NY, United States
Jacqueline C. Hairston, MD
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, NY, United States
Abigail Laughlin, BS
Columbia University
New York, NY, United States
Erin Louwagie, BS, MS
Columbia University
New York, NY, United States
Chia Ling Nhan Chang, MD (she/her/hers)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, NY, United States
Qi Yan, MS, PhD
Assistant Professor
Columbia University
New York, NY, United States
Uma M. Reddy, MD, MPH
Professor and Vice Chair of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
kristin Myers, BS, PhD
Associate Professor
Columbia University
New York, NY, United States
Short cervical length is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). This study measured cervical stiffness in patients with a short cervix as an additional assessment to estimate sPTB risk. We also compared the change in cervical stiffness throughout pregnancy for patients with a short cervix with and without a pessary. Lastly, we compared cervical stiffness between patients who delivered preterm versus term.
Study Design:
Single-site ancillary study to a randomized-controlled trial of usual care versus pessary placement among patients with a singleton gestation and a short cervix (≤2 cm). Aspirated cervical stiffness (aCS) was measured at baseline visit 1 (16w-23w6d) using the Pregnolia aspiration device and again at visit 2 (26-30w0d). At both visits, the cervical shape was obtained using transvaginal ultrasound. Computer-aided design and finite element analysis software combined these measurements with aCS to generate computed CS (cCS). Welch’s t-tests compared the baseline aCS and cCS and the difference in visit 2 and baseline aCS and cCS between patients in each treatment group. Lastly, aCS and cCS were compared between patients who delivered term or preterm, regardless of treatment.
Results:
At baseline, there was no difference in aCS between patients randomized to pessary (n=17) or usual care (n=16) (aCS=78mbar ± 40 vs 76mbar ± 39, p >0.05). At visit 2, patients randomized to pessary (n=10) had an increase in aCS and cCS compared to baseline value, while the patients randomized to usual care (n=8) had a decrease. However, this result was not statistically significant (aCS=7mbar ± 40 vs -18mbar ± 28 p >0.05; cCS=8kPa ± 67 vs -13kPa ± 23, p >0.05). Regardless of the treatment group, patients who delivered before 37 weeks (n=17) had lower cCS than those who delivered at term (n=18) (cCS =18kPa ± 16 vs 38kPa ± 33, p< 0.05).
Conclusion:
There was no significant difference in cervical stiffness between patients who received a pessary and those who did not. When not accounting for the treatment arms, patients with lower cervical stiffness delivered preterm.