Fetus
Poster Session 3
Romain Corroenne, MD PhD
TExas Childrens Hospital
Houston, TX, United States
Jessian L. Munoz, MD, MPH, PhD (he/him/his)
Clinical Assistant Professor
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX, United States
Cara Buskmiller, MD, MS
Perinatal Surgery Fellow
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX, United States
Ahmed A. Nassr, MD, PhD
Associate professor
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX, United States
roopali V. donepudi, MD
Assistant Professor
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX, United States
Michael A. Belfort, MD, PhD (he/him/his)
Professor, Chairman
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, TX, United States
Magdalena Sanz Cortes, MD, PhD
Associate Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, TX, United States
To compare outcomes after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) for twin-twin transfusion (TTTS) with or without concomitant selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR) based on single or dual survival postlaser.
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study of patients with TTTS treated by FLP in 1 institution between 11/2011 and 04/2023.SFGR was defined by a fetal weight < 10 percentile in 1 fetus and intertwin discordance of >25%. Outcomes were compared between TTTS with no SFGR and TTTS+SFGR.
Results:
186/422(44.1%) patients presented TTTS+SFGR and 236/422(55.9%) presented with isolated TTTS.
Gestational age(GA) (20.1[15.9-29.0] vs 20.1[15.9-27.9] weeks, p=0.53), cervical length at the time of FLP (38[10-70] vs 37[11-57]mm, p=0.3) and rate of PPROM (16/226[7.1%] vs 17/183[9.4%], p=0.19) were similar between TTTS and TTTS+SFGR.
Postlaser dual survival was higher in cases of isolated TTTS (200/236[84.7%] vs TTTS+SFGR 142/186[76.3%], p=0.03).
There were some relevant differences when outcomes between single survivor after FLP with TTTS vs TTTS+SFGR where compared: Main difference before FLP was a higher proportion of stage 3 TTTS in the latter group (83.8% vs 34.6%, p< 0.01), as the proportion of anterior placentas, GA at laser and surgical time were similar. PPROM was more frequent in the TTTS+SFGR group (0 vs 16%, p=0.03), and they delivered at an earlier GA than compared to those with isolated TTTS (33.4 vs 30.0weeks, p=0.04). There were also differences in the proportion of surviving ex donor fetuses at birth (44% vs 12.5%, p< 0.01) and at 30 days of life (50% vs 11.1%, p< 0.01), with higher rates in the isolated TTTS group. In case of dual survival post laser, the proportion of surviving ex-donor were significantly higher at birth and at 30 days in the isolated TTTS group.
Conclusion:
FLP for TTTS+SFGR was associated with a decreased rate in dual survival with an increased risk of donor demise. Outcomes in cases of TTTS+SFGR where there was a single survivor were worse than if isolated TTTS was the indication for FLP. Specific explanation of these adverse results need to be elucidated.