Clinical Obstetrics
Poster Session 4
Rubymel Jijon Knupp, MD
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Specialist
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jacksonville, FL, United States
Christina T. Blanchard, MS
Statistician
Center for Women’s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Annkay Alexander, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Jordan Garcia, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Jenna Stanford, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Kevin S. Shrestha, MD, MPH
Fellow
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Kaitlyn Kincaid, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
William Andrews, MD, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Lorie M. Harper, MD, MSCI (she/her/hers)
Associate Professor
University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School
Austin, TX, United States
Jeff M. Szychowski, PhD
Associate Professor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Brian M. Casey, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Alan T. Tita, MD, PhD
Professor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL, United States
Rachel Sinkey, MD (she/her/hers)
University of South Florida
Tampa, FL, United States
From 2/2021 to 2/2023, 74 patients were randomized. eCO values at randomization were higher in the intervention group (15.4±8.8 vs 11.3±5.6, p=0.02). Thirty in the intervention and 32 in the control arm had delivery data available for analysis. Prevalence of smoking ≥10 cigarettes/day at FM per eCO was not different (73% vs 50%, p=0.06). Prevalence of self-reported ≥10 cigarettes/day (39% vs 52%, p=0.30), average # of self-reported cigarettes/day (8.1±8.5 vs 7.8±5.2, p=0.90), average # of cigarettes per eCO (18.3±9.4 vs 14.6±9.6; p=0.12), and average %FCH (4.3±4.8 vs 2.6±1.9, p=0.08), all at FM, were not different between the intervention and control groups, respectively (Table). Clinical outcomes including FGR (3% vs 0%, p=0.49), GA at delivery (35±5.8 vs 36±4.0, p=0.29), BW (2396±1129 vs 2785±722g p=0.27) and 5-minute Apgars (7±3 vs 8±2, p=0.73) were not different. Despite this, most participants in the intervention and control arms (83% vs 60%, p=0.14) report planning future device use.
Conclusion: Exhaled carbon monoxide monitoring in pregnancy did not improve smoking cessation or clinical outcomes.